Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorΜποτετζάγιας, Ιωσήφel_GR
dc.contributor.authorΛέκκος, Νικόλαοςel_GR
dc.coverage.spatialΜυτιλήνηel_GR
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T10:36:10Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T10:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2009el_GR
dc.identifier.otherhttps://catalog.lib.aegean.gr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=ed763fb5-024d-4d04-a952-e71cbf110eaa#recordId=1.7365el_GR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11610/9933
dc.description.abstractThe most important aim of this research project is to identify the weaknesses of five different Environmental Statements, for proposed wind farms in the United Kingdom. The review method that this research project used to analyze and compare the results was the Lee and Colley review method which is the most widely used method in United Kingdom. The Environmental Statements which were submitted over a 3 year period from 2002 to 2004 are considered in this project. Based on minimum sample size the findings suggest that Environmental Statements increased their overall quality since previous studies by Canelas et al. (2004). The second conclusion was that improvements still need to be made in certain areas of Environmental Statements to improve the overall quality. The analysis with the Lee and Colley framework identified the following weaknesses such as weak provision of information with some gaps and weaknesses which hinder the decision process, but it also requires minor work to reduce gaps in Health and Safety management during the construction period. Some Environmental Statements have not mentioned anything about the “do nothing scenario”, time scales could be clearer and it would be useful to include some more elements about decommissioning. When compared to earlier studies it was found that all Environmental Statements that this research project examined had Non Technical Summary. Also, the Environmental Statements provide more information without major gaps like some projects before 1991 (Canelas et al. 2004). On the other hand areas there are still weaknesses such as “do nothing scenario”, some gaps in information about the existing environment and possible impacts and also weak points in Health and Safety management are one of the important findings of the project. Key words: Environmental Statement, Health and Safety \management, Environmental Impact Assessment, Lee and Colley framework, Non Technical Summary.el_GR
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectΜελέτες περιβαλλοντικών επιπτώσεωνel_GR
dc.subjectEnvironmental statementen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact assessmenten_US
dc.subjectNon-technical summaryen_US
dc.subjectLee and Colleyen_US
dc.titleCritical analysis of the weaknesses in the environmental impact assessment process as evidenced by environmnetal statements studies submitted in European Unionen_US
dcterms.accessRightscampusel_GR
dcterms.rightsΠλήρες Κείμενο - Ενδοπανεπιστημιακή Δημοσίευση Κλειδωμένη η δυνατότητα αντιγραφής
heal.typebachelorThesisel_GR
heal.academicPublisherΠανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου. Σχολή Περιβάλλοντος. Τμήμα Περιβάλλοντος.el_GR
heal.academicPublisherIDaegeanel_GR
heal.fullTextAvailabilityfalseel_GR
dc.notesΟ συγγραφέας επιτρέπει την πρόσβαση στο πλήρες κείμενο του ηλεκτρονικού αρχείου ΜΟΝΟ εντός του Πανεπιστημιακού δικτύου (ενδοπανεπιστημιακή πρόσβαση)el_GR
dc.notesΟ συγγραφέας δεν έχει καταθέσει το ηλεκτρονικό αρχείο του τεκμηρίου. Η ψηφιοποίηση παραμένει σε εκκρεμότηταel_GR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record